It was a night like many other but still was something about that night that changed America and the whole world in one second. The life and the death played the last tango and the death celebrated its triumph on October 1, 2017, after the one of the deadliest mass shooting by lone wolf in U.S. history.


Route 91 Harvest music festival on the Las Vegas Strip in Paradise will be known as the bloody festival from now on. The mass-murderer, Stephen Paddock, loaded with weapons, opened   fire on the outdoor crowd that was enjoying the performance of singer Jason Aldean. The police has reported that the gunman was shooting into the people for more than 10 minutes that caused the black statistic at the end: 59 killed (including the killer) and 489 that were injured in this attack.


The public was shocked, sad and angry. The innocent people paid again for the price of lunacy. No matter if it is an act of terrorism, domestic crime or pathology of lone wolves, the U.S. is very endangered, sometimes targeted and very often hurt. The question is not anymore who is committing those deeds and why but how such people could be detected and eventually stopped to make a massacre. American book of tragedies has a lot of chapter that involve the mass-shootings as the expression of accumulated anger, madness or revenge by some lone wolves or the fellows of some ideology. It is almost like a horror movie alive. You can feel and smell the storm that is coming. You can follow the evil seed from its first stage. The lone wolf attacker is someone that is developing his own attributes and destruction talents in the silence and maybe for years but it could be for months or weeks. It depends on what he is dealing with and how is his personality shaped. If we talk about the lone individual that is full of hatred towards the system but still not linked to any ideological center, I believe we should define him as the lone wolf attacker while the one who is the same but orchestrated by some ideological group and for some bigger goals, should be named as the lone wolf terrorist. This is my own perspective and it is based on my observations of the social phenomena of expressed anger and frustrations that touch the line of individual and group sadism.


In the case of 64 years old Stephen Paddock, the global community will digest everything that comes from the ongoing investigation. For now, the experts believe that he is not the product of any kind of terrorism but there are many points to be studied for the conclusion about his motives. There are information that he had been buying arms since 1982 and that his collection of weapons was impressive. Mr.Paddock managed to get almost 33 pieces in the past year and Jill A. Snyder, the special agent in charge of the San Francisco office of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives stated that the Bureau would not have been alerted about such purchases : ”The Gun Control Act of 1968 requires sellers to report the sale or disposition of two or more handguns to the same buyer, only if those purchases occur at the same time or within five business days of each other. There is no federal law requiring sellers to alert the bureau to the sale of multiple rifles.”


The main debate now in the divided USA is who is directly responsible for this attack, from the structural layers. We are talking about the guns and their importance in American society. The never-ending discussions between Republicans and Democrats about the guns and their potential control. When Democrats express their concern about the influence of guns, I am thinking that guns are individuals, that they have bodies, souls and minds. If is not sad, it would be funny to witness that liberals accuse actually guns for the deaths of people. Guns do not go around and kill people but people get guns, use them and bring tears and pain. The illusions that have some advocates of anti-gun policy show their lack of real knowledge what is killing about and who is committing the killing. Do they think that ban of guns will eliminate the killing appetite of the sick people? Unfortunately, the root of the American problem is deeper as the surface of pro and anti-guns arguments.


The gun culture is the identity itself, the form of crucial society and its freedoms. It is very controversial issue that has an ambiguous meaning. According to Adam Lankford, criminal justice professor and author of the 2015 study “Mass Shooters, Firearms, and Social Strains: A Global Analysis of an Exceptionally American Problem”, it is about guns and about all: „For one side, guns represent aggression, violence, and a somewhat paranoid and anachronistic perspective that you have to protect yourself from external threats,” Lankford said. “For the other side, guns represent safety, security, and self-sufficiency — and wrapped up in some of that is often a form of traditional masculinity whereby the man of the house must be able to physically protect his family.”


There is an evidence that 91% of Republicans claim that owning a gun is their essential right in comparison with only 43% of Democrats who think the same. Maybe it is almost like tribal, partisan feelings that color the American fight for or against guns. One group is feeling safe with guns while other group is feeling very insecure. Who will ever control the mass?

It is so easy to manipulate the people and serve them the truth that they have to follow. If you have enough strong media tools, you will forced them to believe that poor guns are responsible for dead people and not sick people who had mental outbreaks. The last US President, Barack Obama tried to politicize the story about guns, after the mass shooting in Oregon, back in 2015. The numerous number of gun rights groups and the National Rifle Association has made a good job to oppose the illogical attempts of democrats to limit the gun freedoms.


I would ask all of them if they would let their own mothers, sisters or daughters without guns in the dangerous or isolated areas. I am sure they would not. The guns are supportive element for everyone who could be possibly targeted as the victim or far away from the institutional help. They are dangerous in the hands of instable people, but the stone in the hands of mentally sick people is also the deadly weapon. Therefore, it has to be something done regarding the lunacy and not regarding the arms rights. The normal people should more focus on abnormal people and situation so they could report them and prevent their explosions. On the other side, the state regulations must be strict and easy to be implemented if there are any signs of abuse of gun rights. The traces of it must be redirected to the federal and local law enforcement authorities


There is no right solution for the killing passions of some individuals or groups but there are always methods of observation and prevention of the zero patient. You cannot blame 325 millions of Americans for one lunatic that pulled the trigger. All you can do is to educate those 325 million of Americans to recognize the problem and lunatics at his early stadium.

In those days or those nights, it is better to have gun in hand than cop on the phone.



  1. Very informative and educational without all the anti or pro gun ideology as you say a rock is a deadly weapon if you want to talk methods of mass destruction that could be brought upon our society I’m happy to share I look at the world and not wonder how it will happen but when if I’m the husband of a retired police officer who was retired due to an on the job injury I and several officers have had this discussion and all of our eyes have been opened by just some of the little things we’ve talked about I really enjoy your articles your writing is impressive as well as informative thank you

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Personally, I perceive the issue of human violence as being directly related to The Theory of Evolution (i.e. On The Origin Of Species, 1859), by Charles Darwin: brute primitive survival is the preoccupation of the species. The US-military and intelligence services have a long history of employing individuals capable of mass killings, for specific political agendas. This makes it very difficult to trace the cause to the government and its commercial sponsors/employers.

    An organism will do its utmost to adapt to its immediate environment; which includes psychological assimilation. Synthetic inducement (i.e. pharmaceuticals and narcotics) can be used to enhance the individual human’s psychological instability, when being unable to accommodate a balanced life (i.e. for the benefit of a political agenda).

    Project MKULTRA (i.e. the CIA’s mind control programme) was the code name given to a programme of experiments on human subjects, at times illegal, designed and undertaken by the CIA. Experiments on humans were intended to identify and develop drugs and procedures to be used in interrogations and torture, in order to weaken the individual to force confessions through mind control and or coerce and induce an individual into acts of violence (e.g. The Manchurian Candidate). Organized through The Scientific Intelligence Division of the CIA, the project co-ordinated with the Special Operations Division of the US-Army’s Chemical Corps.

    The operation began in the early-1950s (officially, sanctioned in 1953) was reduced in scope in 1964, further curtailed in 1967, and officially halted in 1973, ostensibly. The programme engaged in many illegal activities. MKULTRA used numerous methodologies to manipulate people’s mental states and alter brain functions; including the surreptitious administration of drugs (especially, LSD) and other chemicals, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, isolation and verbal abuse, as well as other forms of psychological torture.

    The scope of Project MKULTRA was broad, with research undertaken at 80 institutions, including 44 colleges and universities, as well as hospitals, prisons and pharmaceutical companies. The CIA operated through these institutions using front organizations.

    Though the US-Supreme Court sided with the CIA that sources’ names could be redacted for their protection, it validated the existence of MKULTRA to be used in future court cases and confirmed that the CIA for 14 years performed clandestine experiments on human behaviour.

    Stephen Craig Paddock (1953 – October 1, 2017) was a US-Federal auditor for one year, in 1985, focusing on defense contractors. Towards the end of the 1980s, he worked for three years as an internal auditor for a company that later merged to form Lockheed Martin. His work career after this period is not clear. He was worth at least US$2 million, at the time of his ‘suicide’.


  3. I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was wondering what all is required to get setup? I’m assuming having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny? I’m not very internet savvy so I’m not 100 sure. Any recommendations or advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks


Leave a Reply to Alexander Hakam Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

About Sarahowlgirl1982

I am a master of Political Sciences, with special focus on Security Studies, Islamic Counter Terrorism and Weapons of Mass Destruction. I enjoy discovering and commenting things which are " in the air" but still not spoken.I also do like science writing and planing to move myself into the pure science journalism !