WHERE ARE THE LIMITS OF PERVERTED PEOPLE?

 

The current moral picture of the mankind and the progress of our civilization are not suiting each other very well. Someone would think that the level of development will touch the ethical values and turn them into the perfection. Unfortunately, it is opposite. We are progressing as the human race but we are regressing as the human being. All those expensive technological discoveries and thoughtful scientific projects can’t hide the shameful truth of the failed thinking animal: homo sapiens. The soul disorders, corrupted minds and sexual perversity replace the cultural and intellectual dignity of the modern world. We have reached the stars but we are still digging the caves where we feed our own monsters.

After the global community finally digested  the homosexuality and transexuality, it seems that sexual deviations multiply  themselves in such a cruel way. The social cancer doesn’t stop to bother and it shows  all disturbing signs of metastasis. The sickness is everywhere and the worst problem about it is that some people  try to portrait it as normality. From pedophilia,through zoophilia and necrophilia, the lunacy reached the new point of shame-dendrophilia and ecosexuality.

Ecosexuality is a new sexual identity, movement and orientation of people who believe that  Nature is not a mother but a lover and that sexual and romantic relation with Earth will save us all. That sounds ridiculous but according to statistical data, this trend is on rise and in 2016, there were 100,000 people that identified themselves as ecosexuals.

Annie Sprinkle and her partner, Beth Stephens, both devoted to the environmentalism and free art and hippie intellectualism, have launched their names and ecosexual movement through their activism and odd events – 15 large-scale weddings to the likes of the Earth, the moon, the sun and the sea.  They have been known then as ecosexuals in 2009, after their famous wedding to the Earth. Since then, being ecosexual is a matter of sexual choice, sexual perversity or simply weird subculture community.

Back in 2008, Stefanie Iris Weiss, writer and activist from New York, researched for her book “Eco-sex:Go Green Between the Sheets and Make Your Love Life Sustainable”, and she offered a new concept of sexual enjoyment. She claimed in her book, published in 2010, that impact of materials used in condoms, lubes and other sex products is totally harmful for the environment:”She said that she wrote the book to help people make their sex lives “more carbon neutral and sustainable,” and to help us avoid polluting our bodies when we have sex.” At that time, she hasn’t been really aware of two ecosexual artists that fought for the ecosexuality as the cure for  the sick Earth. Later, she admitted that her book was more theoretical view and when she embraced the Sprinkle and Stephens philosophy, her project was complete: help for people to reconnect with nature and with their own bodies.

What they are trying to promote is sexual feelings towards Earth instead of considering it as a Mother and in neutral way. Ecosexuals believe that Earth is not he or she, it is transgender and that is the reason why we must develop sexual desires for the Earth as a lover and according to them:”If you piss off your mother, she’s probably going to forgive you. If you treat your lover badly, she’s going to break up with you.”

This is not an aggressive ideology and it relies mostly on the individual approach mixed with sexology than on the political activism and working policy. Ecosocialists are timeless hippies with weird sexuality, lost common sense and odd art talent, but they are not evil, just damaged. We can’t put them in the same box with those who practice pedophilia, zoophilia or necrophilia, because they do not abuse anyone. However, this movement is a proof that bizarre things will never stop to occur and to shock, like it is never enough. Thinking about ecosexuals now in Trump’s America is almost ironic, especially when we know the President Trump attitude regarding climate changes and queer issues.

The malign side of obsession with nature is expressed in dendrophilia or phytophilia.It could be identified as zoophilia, in the level of sickness and abusement, but it targets  trees and plants instead of animals. Dendrophilia is also known as arborphilia or love of trees. Sometimes it is described as emotional relation with trees and plants but sometimes it goes to the sexual zones of arousement.  Brenda Love wrote in her “Encyclopedia of Unusual Sex Practices” that in some ancient cultures, trees were symbols of fertility and that men went to the forests on special days to ejaculate them and to confirm their own sexual power.

Thomas Gregor in his book from 1985 “Anxious Pleasures: the Sexual Lives Of An Amazonian People” wrote the following:“I have been able to find only two other stories of masturbation, and in both, men are the principal actors. In one tale we learn of a man who found a remarkably gratifying hole in a tree, which he began to use to the exclusion of his wife and girlfriends. In the second story, a man made an artificial vagina of leaves to which he became similarly attached. In both myths, the culprits were seen by other villagers who hacked away the hole with an axe and tore the leaf vagina to shreds. In both stories, the masturbators behaved as if their leafy companions had been real women. They wailed for the deceased plants, cut their hair short, and took off their belts as a symbol of mourning.”

The dendrophilia itself is a sexual taboo of our modern societies and it could be found more in virtual world among followers, than in reality, committed by some.  The same is with phytophilia, that literally means sexual attraction to the plants. In some literature, the phytophilia is also defined  as the interest for the plants, that could be platonic and not sexually based. Nevertheless, we could never accuse someone that he or she is sexually abusing plants or trees because it is hard to find evidences. Sick people could buy plants and abuse at their homes or they could go into the wildness and directly itercourse with trees. If we look objective, the plants and trees aren’t hurt physically like in the case of zoophilia, but the respect and borders for other species is lost. The people nowadays are like the beast, unleashed beasts that can consume everything for their sexual hunger. That could be innocent child, poor animal, silent dead body or voiceless tree. They are not anymore satisfied with their own race but they have to exploit other species that do not deserve our sickness and our sexual disorders.

Personally, I have no respect for any kind of sexual deviations and consider them as a social plague. The ecosexuals should better send their sick phantasies into the past and they should move themselves into the real activism and environmental policy. They should work more and talk less. That mutated liberal ideology of group of people on mushrooms and with the erotic ideas about Nature is not what will save this Planet. If we don’t pick up our brains, lost on the road and if we don’t recall our ethical values, we will be forever gone, as the species that has never reached the next level of existence.